adbuster buster
A fair bit of my work has been just like that: pointing a finger at some obvious (yet overlooked) problem and yelling, "Look! A problem!" This is well and good and, I think, useful. But the willful ignorance of evil has it's equally dismal flipside - the willful ignorance of good. There is a lot of beauty and truth and niceness out there. People give hugs, return lost wallets and give qualified help for free to those who can't afford it.
In light of that smiling point, this is the problem I have with magazines like "Adbusters": while they're useful and necessary and probably point to solutions by implication, they spend pretty much all their time whining and pointing and cynicizing. Down with evil corporations and unchecked consumerism and entertainmentcentricity - yes! But also, up with people! Up with sunshine and rain and hugs and up with babies and kisses and hope!
I don't know, maybe this is just wishful thinking on my part - maybe I just want it to be true because I've gone and half-made a kid that is almost born and I cannot stomach an utterly doom-and-gloom worldview because of it. But I think not.
1 Comments:
I'm with you here -- it's good to have cynics, in order that they question the establishment and keep it honest. I always wonder, though, who questions the cynics.
It's barely more difficult to be a blind, unthinking subversive than it is to be a blind, unthinking member of the establishment. Neither gets anyone farther ahead, because both sides are still trapped in that false binary.
(Often I get frustrated with political parties because they so often seem to be arguing two sides of the same coin, for just this reason.)
Post a Comment
<< Home